Indicators on banking law cases You Should Know
Indicators on banking law cases You Should Know
Blog Article
“There is not any ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any of your present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din saw firstly the deceased and after far they observed the petitioners going towards the same direction, did not signify that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. This kind of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of last witnessed.
Delay in recording confessional statement may not be treated fatal to the case of prosecution(Murder Trial)
116 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the instant case, the guidelines as established forth would not implement, given that the criminal Court has not convicted the petitioner, relatively he has become acquitted on the criminal charges based on evidence and it truly is properly-settled legislation that once the civil servant is acquitted while in the criminal case, then on this quite charge he cannot be awarded in any punishment through the department and held him disqualified for that post because acquittal for all potential purposes. The aforesaid proposition is established at naught because of the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of your District Police Officer Mainwali and a pair of others v.
Note: Please fill any field and Click on Search button, if you do not know the complete information please leave field blank.
Make use of the PACER Case Locator if you are not sure which specific federal court the case was filed. You might also conduct nationwide searches to determine whether or not a party is involved in the federal case. This database updates at midnight daily.
In this site post, we will delve into the details of Section 302 PPC, exploring its provisions and the gravity of its punishment.
ninety six . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is well-settled that though thinking of the case of standard promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has got to think about the advantage of all of the qualified candidates and after thanks deliberations, to grant promotion to this sort of qualified candidates who will be found for being most meritorious amongst them. Considering that the petitioner was held to become senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was overlooked via the respondent department just to extend favor on the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy over the part of your respondent department.
Any court may possibly find to distinguish the present case from that of a binding precedent, to achieve a different conclusion. The validity of such a distinction may or may not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to some higher court.
13. The Supreme Court has held that when the act of misconduct is recognized and also the employee is found guilty after thanks process of law, it is the prerogative in the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, away from the different penalties provided in regulation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed just isn't proportionate with the seriousness of the act of misconduct is not really satisfactory but the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion in a very structured and lawful fashion. Read more
Therefore, this petition is found for being not maintainable and it is dismissed along with the pending application(s), plus the petitioners may perhaps search for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
If the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a possibility to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may possibly allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is often only completed When the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence as well get more info as petitioner company responded to your allegations as such they were very well aware of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use being appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
Regardless of its popularity, not many could concentrate on its intricacies. This article is surely an attempt to highlight the flaws of this section plus the really very low threshold that governs it.
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement of the laws, the legal system adheres for the doctrine of stare decisis
This section specifically applies to civil servants that are rendered surplus due to the reorganization or abolition of the division, department, or office. Non-civil servants, by definition, are usually not topic to the provisions in the Civil Servants Act. Their terms and conditions of service are typically governed by separate contracts or agreements with the employing organization. Therefore, the provisions of Section eleven-A, such as the possibility of being posted to another department, would not apply to non-civil servants. Read more